Search for: All records

Global biodiversity and ecosystem function are the result of complex networks of interactions and feedbacks between animals and their environments, which in turn are affected by the interactions and feedbacks between animals and the organisms they host. Understanding these complex networks, including the main drivers of and responses to ecological and environmental changes and their global implications, requires adopting a systems-based perspective. We advocate for this approach by characterizing a framework centered around bats, a globally-distributed mammalian order, and their dual roles as both inhabitants of ecosystems and as habitats themselves. Like other organisms, bats interact with habitats by providing ecosystem services that impact the survival and distribution of other species, and may be affected by such factors as land use change, climate change, fluctuations in food availability, and hunting pressure. Habitat conditions (e.g. food availability, temperature, etc.) can affect the physiological condition of individuals, which in turn can affect the prevalence and/or virulence of hosted organisms and potential pathogens (e.g. ectoparasites, bacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoa). In addition, the interactions among individuals (e.g. co-roosting, migration, etc.) influence the habitat connectivity for their hosted organisms (e.g. opportunities for dispersal). Bats have a unique relationship with infectious disease, both biological and cultural. With this in mind, when applied to bats this framework has special importance to how we understand and apply the One Health concept, whereby healthy natural environments foster both human and animal health, which in turn also promotes healthy environments. By leveraging a hierarchical approach among these different levels of biological organization, we can arrive at a clearer picture of the specific threats facing bats—as well as the risk of pathogen spillover to humans and other domesticated and wild animals generated by disrupting this delicate balance—and identify possible measures to mitigate adverse impacts. Thus, to understand these complex interactions and their implications for conservation, ecosystem health, and human health, we need a new ecological framework that recognizes that changes in habitats not only affect macrofauna and the ecosystem services they provide, but also have the potential to cascade through the diversity and evolution of the organisms they host. This review provides a case study for the application of this framework, which is extensible to other organisms with their own unique relationships with habitats and as habitats. 

Organizational climate is a key determinant of diverse aspects of success in work settings, including in academia. Power dynamics in higher education can result in inequitable experiences of workplace climate, potentially harming the well-being and productivity of employees. Quantifying experiences of climate across employment categories can help identify changes necessary to create a more equitable workplace for all. We developed and administered a climate survey within our academic workplace—the Department of Zoology and Physiology at the University of Wyoming—to evaluate experiences of climate across three employment categories: faculty, graduate students, and staff. Our survey included a combination of closed-response (e.g., Likert-scale) and open-ended questions. Most department members (82%) completed the survey, which was administered in fall 2021. Faculty generally reported more positive experiences than staff. Graduate students often fell between these two groups, though in some survey sections (e.g., mental health and well-being) students reported the most negative experiences of departmental climate. Three common themes emerged from the analysis of open-ended responses: equity, community, and accountability. We discuss how these themes correspond to concrete action items for improving our departmental climate, some of which have been implemented already, while others constitute future initiatives and/or require a collective push towards systemic change in academia. Finally, service work of this type often falls outside of job descriptions, requiring individuals to either work more or trade-off productivity in other areas that are formally evaluated. With the goal of minimizing this burden for others, we detail our process and provide the materials and framework necessary to streamline this process for other departments aiming to evaluate workplace climate as a key first step in building a positive work environment for all employees.